FAQ’s, continued
Why can’t the poor just go to a commercial bank?

Commercial Bank lending is predicated on collateral and how much you are worth. The more you have, the more you get.
Imagine this scenario: you do not have money to open to savings account, you don’t have any collateral to secure a loan, you have no credit history, you do not have a job, and you are illiterate. Now, trying getting a loan from a commercial bank. Good luck. This is the plight of the world’s poor and why microfinance plays such a huge role in alleviating poverty.
Why don’t banks accommodate poor people?
Banks see the poor as high risk because they have no credit and no jobs. Also, microfinance is an expensive undertaking. A banker can make a lot more on a 500k USD home loan compared to a $250 loan to a poor farmer. This effort is not fruitful to many major banks, so they avoid the poor and deem them as “unbankable”. To access financial services, as mentioned earlier, the poor engage in risky informal transactions and seek out moneylenders (people in their villages who will lend them money), who grant usurious loans, with interest rates in excess of 1000% per annum.
What is an MFI? Why do they charge such high interest rates?
A microfinance institution (MFI) is an organization that provide microfinance services to the poor. MFI’s can take shape in many forms: for profit, non profit, a non-governmental organization, a big commercial bank, or a credit union. All MFI’s have the same mission in providing financial services to the poor, but may vary in mission, methodology, or ownership/legal structure.
MFI’s charge high interest rates because it is important that their operations are financially sustainable, so they have to cover all costs. This will ensure the permanence and expansion of the field. Overhead costs for MFI’s are naturally large; issuing ten thousand loans with principal of $100 USD is a lot more time consuming and labor intensive than issuing one loan for $1M USD. (total loan amounts are the same)
There are 3 types of costs a MFI has to cover: the cost of capital, the cost of default, and administrative costs. Assume the cost of capital to the MFI is 12% (it costs the MFI 12% per year to receive capital from investors), and experiences 2% default on money lent, and costs $25 dollars to process the loan. For a $100 loan, the interest rates would be (12%*100)+(2%*100)+25= $39, which translates to a 39% interest rate. For the MFI to break even on a loan of $500 with the same characteristics, the interest rate would be (60+10+25)= $95/$500= 19%.
Although these rates may seem high, they are FAR LESS than what the poor would pay to an informal money lender. These loan sharks in the village would lend to the poor at exorbitant rates (>1000%) and then force them to sell their goods to them at a price arbitrarily decided by them.
The good news is that MFI’s are reducing operating costs as they enhance efficiency through technology. According to CGAP, the average interest rate on a microfinance loan in 2006 was 28%.
When is microfinance not appropriate?
In order for microfinance to be financially sustainable, borrowers obviously must be able to repay their loans. This means that the poor must be able to generate rates of return on their capital that is higher than the interest rate on their loan. Populations with high incidences of disease, geographically dispersed/nomadic populations areas with a, dependence on a single economic activity, and the presence of hyperinflation may not be suitable conditions for microfinance. However, there are alternative solutions that NGO’S and governments can take to fight poverty including grants, infrastructure investment, employment programs, and literacy classes.
Can microfinance be profitable?
When done correctly, absolutely. For example, ever since inception in 1983, Grameen Bank in Bangladesh has turned in a profit every year except 1983, 1991, 1992. History has shown that repayment rates for all MFI’s hovers above 90% (much higher than Western banking with collateral, complex contracts, lawyers, financial planners, etc.) and average rates of return are higher for MFI’s than many commercial banks in developed economies.
Is microfinance the solution to poverty?
No, microfinance is ONE OF MANY POWERFUL TOOLS that can be used to eradicate poverty. Microfinance should be carefully evaluated against the alternatives when choosing the most appropriate intervention tool.
Part 3 of this lengthy series will be released tomorrow. As mentioned, please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.